| Introduction: middle atmosphere Processes |
The
middle atmosphere includes the stratosphere (ca.
15--45 km or 100--1 hPa) and the mesosphere (ca. 45--90
km or 1--0.005 hPa).
The distribution of ozone and the processes by which it interacts
with the sun's radiation to alter the temperature profile of
the middle atmosphere are important to understand and to model.
The middle atmosphere climate model is a key component of the UK
Chemistry Aerosol Community Model (UKCA) project to develop
a chemistry-climate model with the UM.
The process of methane oxidation creates a source of water
vapour in the stratosphere which is modelled by a simple rate
equation parametrization. However, water vapour concentrations
in the stratosphere are an order of magnitude lower than in the
troposphere, creating a serious challenge for data assimilation
of humidity variables.
In the middle atmosphere, the mesosphere especially, the dissipation
of small-scale, unresolved buoyancy waves with a range of phase
speeds and wavelengths provides a drag on the mesospheric winds
that significantly affects the mean flow. The UM represents the
effects of a spectrum of sub-gridscale non-orographic gravity
waves using a scheme originally developed at the Centre
for Atmospheric Science at Cambridge University (Warner and
McIntyre 1999, 2001).
The operational forecast model currently uses a Unified Model
(UM) configuration that has 50 vertical levels, with a top at
63 km, and a horizontal resolution of 40 km. For research climate
modelling, the UM is configured with coarser horizontal resolution
(usually 1.25° latitude by 1.875° longitude) but with
60 vertical levels, pushing the top to 84 km. Development of
a 70-level configuration, with a top at 80 km, is currently in
progress and may eventually replace both 50-level and 60-level
versions. All three sets of levels have coarser spacing in the
middle atmosphere than in the troposphere.
 |
Vertical Level Configurations in the Unified Model |
| Middle Atmosphere Model Results |
The mean climate of the UM middle atmosphere model during the
solstice periods of January and July can be compared against
the 10-year climatology of observations assimilated by the Met
Office operational system (see Middle Atmosphere
Analysis). The temperatures clearly show the change in vertical
gradients from cooling with height in the troposphere to warming
with height in the stratosphere (or near isothermal in the lower
stratosphere summer extratropics) and reversing again in the
mesosphere. As the ionization and chemical dissociation processes
that lead to the formation of the thermosphere are currently
not represented in the UM, it cannot be expected to model the
position of the mesopause with accuracy. The trend to colder
mesopause temperatures over the summer poles, however, relates
to a global circulation set up as a result of momentum deposited
by gravity waves in the mesosphere. A key feature in the middle
atmosphere wind pattern is the presence of a strong westerly
jet in the winter hemisphere that builds up as air above the
pole cools during the winter night. Summer hemisphere wind flows
in the middle atmosphere are predominantly easterly.
 |
5-year mean climatology of a representative 60-Level
climate simulation using the Met Office Unified Model
|
 |
10-year mean climatology from the Met Office middle atmosphere
analysis with assimilated observations |
The lifting stratopause towards the winter pole is considered
to be reasonably realistic, as are the closure of the westerly
circumpolar winter vortex jets in the mesosphere and their tendency
to tilt equatorwards in the UM climate simulations. However,
the equatorward tilt of the southern hemisphere winter vortex
appears to be weaker than indicated by the assimilated data.
Differences are smaller in the northern hemisphere winter vortex
which is anyway weaker due to the impact of planetary wave activity
(mostly resolved by the model) generated over land masses.
Small scale buoyancy waves are thought to be important for
driving the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) as well as providing
a drag on the mesospheric winds. In the UM some of these waves
are resolved at scales greater than the model grid, while the
effects of gravity waves at unresolved scales are represented
through parametrization. The UM reproduces the QBO with a reasonable
amplitude and a periodicity that can be made to match that observed
(ca. 27 months). Nonetheless, the non-orographic gravity wave
parametrization remains an area of active development, both in
the UM and in the wider academic community where the issue of
how to represent gravity wave sources continues to stimulate
debate.
 |
5-year timeseries of equatorial zonal mean zonal wind
from the Met Office middle atmosphere analysis with assimilated
observations |
| |
 |
5-year timeseries of equatorial zonal mean zonal wind
from a representative 60-level climate simulation using
the Unified Model |
|